So on Friday I had my biannual presentation to the Graduate Research Conference at RMIT. I think I did okay. I presented the five theses and they appeared to appreciate them, and acknowledge that I’ve progressing along. A couple of concerns arose in my presentation that I’ve been asked to consider in greater depth.

1. Use of graphic & text. I’m finding the study of blogs unique in the tradition of researching religion online, which has always (it seems) focussed on how people use text online to communicate. Now bloggers are creating pages and posts using graphics, pictures, colour schemes, embedded sound and video (Flash, YouTube, etc). I think it’s important to acknowledge how these factors contribute to the communication of religious identity, and so a study of them should be included in the work. Yet I’ve found very little in the way of researching image and sound together with text. I guess I’m looking for a framework to do semiotic study on image and sound and its relationship with text, but I’ve found nothing so far beyond simple taxonomies of text/image placement. I’m interested but I’m afraid it will take up way too much time and effort.

2. Women EC bloggers. I’ve got a massive majority of men bloggers in my sample, with only about 10% female. I don’t think it’s an under-representation though. I think men are more attracted to blogging than women (after all, we are more narcissistic that way ;-) ). The apparent lack of female bloggers in my sample was an issue for me up until about a year ago when I was warned off by advisors about getting too deep into feminist issues. It seems this year they’ve changed their minds. They’d like me to look at the place of women in emerging church discourse, the place of women in the blogosphere and notions of female embodiment in religion (like incarnational mission, ordination & ministry etc) as compared to disembodiment in virtual communication. I’m keen on exploring this stuff, though I imagine it will in the end be a relatively minor portion of my thesis. My only problem is that if my advisors hadn’t umm-ed and aaah-ed about it so much over the past one and a half years I could have done some good work on it already, and I’m fearing I’m off to a late start on it.

What do you guys think of this?