<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another perspective on 2:37</title>
	<atom:link href="http://teusner.org/2007/01/07/another-perspective-on-237/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://teusner.org/2007/01/07/another-perspective-on-237/</link>
	<description>... exploring religion and culture in an online world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://teusner.org/2007/01/07/another-perspective-on-237/comment-page-1/#comment-2322</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teusner.org/2007/01/07/another-perspective-on-237/#comment-2322</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t get into it. It moved too slowly for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t get into it. It moved too slowly for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://teusner.org/2007/01/07/another-perspective-on-237/comment-page-1/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 09:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://teusner.org/2007/01/07/another-perspective-on-237/#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>I thought 2:37 was a great first film, for a very young director (21 at the time!) - and I really liked some of the young actors. 

POSSIBLE SPOILERS**********

I thought that the film relied too heavily on the shock value of watching such graphic scenes. The incestuous rape, bleed out, etc...

Also, I have read that some viewers were unimpressed with a film that sets up a &quot;who did it&quot; scenario, then finishes with a &quot;concluding suicide&quot; by a character that had no development throughout the film. Some felt a bit tricked.

Another film that has left some audiences feeling a little bewildered (esp American) is Cache (or Hidden). Did you watch this film Paul?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought 2:37 was a great first film, for a very young director (21 at the time!) &#8211; and I really liked some of the young actors. </p>
<p>POSSIBLE SPOILERS**********</p>
<p>I thought that the film relied too heavily on the shock value of watching such graphic scenes. The incestuous rape, bleed out, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, I have read that some viewers were unimpressed with a film that sets up a &#8220;who did it&#8221; scenario, then finishes with a &#8220;concluding suicide&#8221; by a character that had no development throughout the film. Some felt a bit tricked.</p>
<p>Another film that has left some audiences feeling a little bewildered (esp American) is Cache (or Hidden). Did you watch this film Paul?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

